In the era of remote work, persuading employees to relocate is a challenge for CHROs. Despite return to office mandates from employers—many want staff in the office at least some of the time—the mix of financial climate and a booming ‘work from anywhere’ trend has led to many workers choosing to decline job offers or quit existing roles rather than uproot.
Hiring trends reveal that only 2% of Americans are now relocating—while a third of workers say they’d turn down an office-based job, even if it had a good salary, benefits, and holiday time. By comparison, in 1986, 45% of Americans moved home to be close to their place of work.
Companies are exploring ways to adapt businesses, attract quality talent, and entice employees that have settled into a remote-working routine back into the office. Korn Ferry’s 2024 Talent Acquisition Trends Report cites the ‘relocate or resign’ talent conundrum as a big challenge facing recruiters. So, what can they do?
Assess the Talent Needs
CHROs say flexibility and location of work continue to have the biggest impact on people strategy, according to a recent Korn Ferry straw poll on C-Suite opinions on People Strategy conducted in December 2023.
It is therefore crucial to evaluate the business case, and whether the position actually needs to be in-office or not. Every organization is built differently, and the degree to which remote work trends are suitable can vary tremendously.
“In the aerospace and defense community, for example, we can’t easily outsource as we almost always require US citizens, and they have to work in secure environments,” says Dave Bakkeby, Korn Ferry Professional Search, North America, Aerospace & Defense Sector Lead. “It’s also very difficult to pull roles away from location wherever there is a product supply chain, say in manufacturing.”
Not that this stops potential talent from wanting to work remotely. “Whatever the industry, there’s probably not one salesperson out there today who won’t ask if it’s a remote role,” he adds. “We see that almost 100% of the time.”
“Millennials make up about 50% of the workforce now and they have a very clear perspective about not wanting to go into the office,” notes Korn Ferry’s APAC President Esther Colwill, speaking to Bloomberg about the 2024 hiring trends.
Before shaping staff relocation policy or enforcing a return to office mandates, the CHRO and C-suite must evaluate the wins and losses of a more remote workforce in the short- and long-term. They must consider both the management of existing employees and any recruitment needs, plus future talent pools for executive positions.
Understand the Financial Hurdles
According to Bakkeby, the sheer cost of relocation is one of the biggest problems facing the workforce. In a time of soaring mortgage rates and living costs, the bill to relocate just a few miles can stretch into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. And long gone are the days of generous relocation packages. “We see companies able to offer just $50,000 relocation bonus towards a move," says Bakkeby. "It’s a non-starter.”
Meanwhile, existing employees who relocated from cities to inexpensive areas when remote work polices were lenient have seen their pay packets go further—and they’re unwilling to give this up. While some companies have floated the idea of pay cuts for remote-based employees, this is a morale-killer. More subtly, organizations might consider a pay freeze for these employees until wages catch up with inflation.
Companies who need employees back in the office—but can’t swallow the full cost of relocation—are investigating other financial incentives, from sign-on and retention bonuses to other unique benefits.
“In one case an employer paid $55,000 a year for a private school for the employee’s child,” notes Bakkeby.
CHROs are also experimenting with alternative accommodation options to promote staff relocation. These include corporate apartments that remote workers can use occasionally, multi-year rent stipends and even building company-owned accommodation near headquarters.